Language, Identity and the Digital Realm

Language, Identity and the Digital Realm

Effects of Virtual vs. Blended Instruction on the Development of Oral/Aural Skills and Language Learning Motivation of Iranian Upper-Intermediate EFL Learners

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Mohammad javad Rezai
Mohadeseh Sedghi
Faculty of Foreign Languages, Azad University, Yazd, Iran
10.22034/lidr.2025.722888
Abstract
Recent technological advancements have significantly impacted various aspects of human life, including education, leading to the introduction of new trends in teaching methodology. This study explores the effects of virtual and blended instructional strategies on the academic performance and motivation levels of upper-intermediate Iranian EFL students. To achieve the intended objectives, a quasi-experimental explanatory sequential mixed methods design was employed, integrating quantitative and qualitative methodologies for data collection and analysis. Sixty participants were selected from language institutes and assigned to virtual, blended, and traditional teaching approaches. The findings highlighted the substantial and positive impact of the blended teaching strategy on both listening and speaking skills, as well as its significant effect on motivation. Conversely, the virtual approach showed some improvements in listening skills; however, its effect on speaking skills and motivation was not statistically significant. Qualitative analyses from interviews provided valuable insights into learners' experiences, emphasizing the importance of facilitative and autonomous instructional methods within technology-enhanced educational frameworks. This study underscores the need for a balanced approach that efficiently utilizes technology while preserving essential components of in-person social interaction in language education.
Keywords
Blended instruction
Listening skill
Motivation
Speaking skill
Virtual instruction
Alipour, P. (2020). The effect of online vs blended learning on vocabulary development among intermediate EFL learners. Cogent Education, 7(1), 3-50.
Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States. The Sloan Consortium, 1-26.
Alvarado, M., & Calderon, I. (2013). Diagnóstico estadístico y tendencias de la educación superior a distancia en Colombia. En La Educación Superior a Distancia y Virtual en Colombia: Nuevas realidades (pp. 31-47). ACESAD/VIRTUAL EDUCA
Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning: A technology update and M-learning project summary. Learning and Skills Development Agency.
Aysu, S. (2020). The use of technology and its effects on language learning
motivation. Journal of Language Research (JLR), 4(1), 86-100.
Boo, Z., Dornyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). L2 motivation research 2005–2014: Understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System, 55, 145 – 157.
Bourelle, A., Bourelle, T., Knutson, A. V., & Spong, S. (2016). Sites of multimodal literacy: Comparing student learning in online and face-to-face environments. Computers and Composition. International Journal for Teachers of Writing, 39, 55-70.
Brown, H. D. (2015). Principles of language learning and teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 14(2). DOI:10.2307/3586319.
Burns, A., & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on speaking. National Center for English Language Teaching and Research.
Chen, C. C., Li, H., & Huang, H. B. (2019). Effects of a mobile game-based English vocabulary learning app on learners’ perceptions and learning performance: A case study of Taiwanese EFL learners. ReCALL, 31(2), 170–188.
Chinnery G. (2006). Going to the MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10 (1), 9-16.
Colley, A., DeGani, R., & Stead, C. (2010). Mobile blogs in language learning: Making the most of informal and situated learning opportunities. ReCALL, 21(1), 96-112.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, evaluating, quantitative and qualitative research (Fourth Edition). Pearson Education Inc.
De Jong, N. H., & Wempe, T. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 385-390.
Demir, B. (2005). An investigation into effects of motivational factors and attitudes of primary
school students on learning English as a foreign language (Unpublished MA Thesis).
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Ekaningrum, V., Cahyono, B.Y., & Irawati, E. (2017). The Effect of Preview, Question, Read, and Summarize (PQRS) strategy on Indonesian EFL students’ writing ability across working memory capacity levels. Applied Research on English Language, 6(4), 25-45.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd edition). Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2011). Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19 (3), 221-246.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Estévez, J. A., Martínez, J., & Granobles, H. R. (2015). La educación virtual en Colombia: Exposición de modelos de deserción. Apertura, 7(1), 17-29.
Facer, K. (2004) Foreword to the literature in mobile technologies and learning. In: Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G. and Sharples, M. (eds.) Future lab report11.http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/lit_reviews/Mobile_Review.pdf.
Fardy, M., Noori Shorabi, H., & Mohammadi, Y. (2012). The effect of using computer-assisted language learning (CALL) on the reading comprehension of narrative texts for the Iranian university male freshmen. Iranian EFL Journal, 8 (1), 292-300.
Fauzan, K. (2008). Cell phones in task-based learning: Are cell phones useful language learning tools? ReCALL, 16(1), 71–84.
Figura, K., & Jarvis, H. (2007). Computer-based materials: A study of learner autonomy and strategies. System, 35, 448–468.
Fransen, J. (2008). Mobile learning: teaching and learning English as a foreign language. University of Michigan Press.
Gardener, E. O. (1985). Preservice science and technical teachers’ attitude towards the teaching of integrated science and teaching methods employed by them. Journal of the Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 24 (1, 2), 209-217.
Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition. Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
Genç İlter, B. (2009). Effect of technology on motivation in EFL classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(4), 1-9.
Hadijah, S. (2014). Listening comprehension hindrances of EFL (English foreign language) Learners on 2016/2017 academic year in English study program at Universities Islam Riau. Journal of English for Academic, 4(1), 1109-124.
Hamilton, V. (2018). Blended learning and second language acquisition in the classroom. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Iowa.
Hamouda, A. (2013). An investigation of listening comprehension problems encountered by Saudi students in the EL listening classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(2), 113-155.
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461-473.
Hsu, R.L.W. (2021). A grounded theory exploration of language massive open online courses: Understanding students’ viewpoints. Sustainability, 13, 25-77.
Khoshnoud, K., & Karbalaei, A. (2014). The effect of online interaction through social networks sites on learning English in Iranian EFL context. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 2(2), 27-33.
Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218.
Kohnke, L. (2020). Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal. DOI:10.1177/0033688220937235.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Laredo Publishing.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, S. (2008). Will Mobile Learning Change Language Learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157-165.
Liaw, S.-S., Huang, H.-M., & fard, G.-D. (2007). An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners’ factors toward e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1906–1920.
Mahmoudi Dehaki, M. (2017). The effect of watching online videos on listening comprehension of Iranian intermediate EFL learners in public schools. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(6), 214-222.
Martin, F., Ndoye, A., & Wilkins, P. (2016). Using learning analytics to enhance student learning in online courses based on quality matters standards. Journal of Educational Technology. Systems, 45(2), 165-187.
Mochida, K., & Harrington, M. (2006). The yes/no test as a measure of receptive vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 23, 73-78.
Nadij, R. (2013). Analytical study on the relationship between discourse markers and speaking fluency of Iranian EFL students. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 2(2), 101-123.
Ni, A. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199-215.
Nowbakht, M., & Fazilatfar, A.M. (2019). The effects of working memory, intelligence and personality on English learners’ speaking ability. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(3), 817-832.
Pallotti, G. (2015). A simple view of linguistic complexity. Second Language Research, 31(1), 117-134.
Parreren, C. V. (1983). Primacy of receptive skills in foreign language learning. System, 11(3), 249-253.
Paul, A., & Friginal, E. (2018). An activity theory framework for analyzing PDAs as lifelong learning tools. Special issue of Learning Media and Technology, 30(2), 107-130.
Peeters, W. (2018). Applying the networking power of Web 2.0 to the foreign language classroom: A taxonomy of the online peer interaction process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1, 87-100.
Pourhossein Gilakjani, A., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2011). A study of factors affecting EFL Learners’ English listening comprehension and the strategies for improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 977-988.
Project RED, (2010). The wolistic study on the impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. The Journal of Educators Online, 7(1), 1-30.
Rafiei, M., Fakhraee Faruji, L., & Azad, M. (2019). The relationship between working memory, speaking accuracy and length of utterances of Iranian EFL learners. Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory, 2(6), 50-60.
Rahmavati, F. (2019). Blended learning in an English listening and speaking course: Freshmen’s voice and choice. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 353, 57-64.
Rajaee Harandi, S. (2015). Effects of e-learning on students' motivation. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 17-25.
Rombot, O. (2021). The development of a blended learning model for reading comprehension learning of Bipa students in grade v elementary school. lkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online, 20 (5), 1155-1164.
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. Pearson Education.
Shi, J.Y., & Fan, L.D. (2021). Investigating teachers’ and students’ perceptions of online English learning in a Maritime context in China. SAGE, 11, 58-72.
Shibley, I., Amaral, K. E., Shank, J. D., & Shibley, L. R. (2011). Designing a blended course: Using ADDIE to guide instructional design. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(6), 80-85.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510-532.
Sugiono, (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Vandergrift, L. (2002). It was nice to see that our predictions were right. Developing metacognition in L2 listening comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review/ Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 58(4), 555–575.
Webb, S. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 33-52.
Webb, S. (2008). Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 79-95.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, & complexity. University of Hawaii Press.
Wu, Q. (2015). Pulling mobile assisted language learning (MALL) into the mainstream: MALL in broad practice. PLos ONE, 10, 1–12.
Xu, D.,  Glick, D., Rodriguez, F., Cung, B., Li, Q., & Warschauer, M. (2019). Does blended instruction develop language learning in developing countries? British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 211-217.
Yudhana, S. (2021). The implementation of blended learning to enhance English reading skills of Thai undergraduate students. English Language Teaching, 14(7), 1-8.
Zhang, R. (2021). Blended course evaluation in the context of English for specific purposes: Accountability and development. SAGE, 11, 21-58.
Zhou, T., & Zhang, W. (2022). Effectiveness study on online or blended language learning based on student achievement: A systematic review of empirical studies. Sustainability, 14, 2-29.