Writing Assessment Literacy of Iranian Secondary School English Teachers: A Focus on Conceptions, Knowledge, and Practices

Razavipour, Kioumars; Goharian, Fatemeh

doi:10.22034/lidr.2025.2077084.1028

Writing Assessment Literacy of Iranian Secondary School English Teachers: A Focus on Conceptions, Knowledge, and Practices

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Kioumars Razavipour

Fatemeh Goharian

Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran

10.22034/lidr.2025.2077084.1028

Abstract

The study of assessment literacy has been an active research agenda over the last couple of decades. Yet, studies exploring English teachers' writing assessment literacy (WAL) are comparatively rare; more so in the Iranian context. This study investigates Iranian secondary school English teachers' conceptions, knowledge, and practices in assessing writing. Data was collected using a questionnaire consisting of 27 items. Using Google forms, the questionnaire was administered to 50 teachers accessed through social media. Descriptive statistical analysis of the data showed the following. The main motivation for assessing L2 writing appeared to be learning, grading, and reporting, respectively. Major language areas that could potentially be improved through assessing writing were found to be accuracy, coherence, diction, fluency, and creativity. Furthermore, teachers' perceptions of assessing L2 writing were rather mixed. Whereas they seemed to endorse a process approach to writing, they held a timed, exam-like perception of writing assessment. Further, they were mostly in favor of a combination of grading and corrective feedback along with diagnostic information on students' writing. Subjective holistic rating was also reportedly common among the respondents. Regarding their knowledge, most teachers estimated their knowledge of key assessment concepts as either average or above average. Likewise, the participants appeared to assess L2 writing in summative, formative, and dynamic ways. In addition, the major barriers in the way of teachers' expanding their writing assessment knowledge were reportedly lack of access to effective training courses or the theoretical and prescriptive nature of the available language testing courses. In terms of assessment practice, writing in small groups, take-home compositions, in-class writing and textbook homework were found to be among the most frequent. These findings carry implication for L2 writing pedagogy and assessment.

Keywords

Writing

Assessment literacy

Conceptions

Knowledge

Practices

Ataie-Tabar, M., Zareian, G., Amirian, S. M. R., & Adel, S. M. R. (2019). A study of socio-cultural conception of writing assessment literacy: Iranian EFL teachers’ and students’ perspectives. English Teaching & Learning, 43(4), 389-409.

Brandt, D. (2009). Writing over reading: New directions in mass literacy. In The future of literacy studies (pp. 54-74): Springer.

Broad, B. (2003). What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing. University Press of Colorado.

Cameron, J. (1999). The Right to Write: An invitation and initiation into the writing life. Penguin.

Canagarajah, S. (2020). English as a Resource in a Communicative Assemblage. In C. J. Hall & R. Wicaksono (eds). Ontologies of English: Conceptualising the language for learning, teaching, and assessment (pp. 295-314). Cambridge University Press.

Cremin & T. Locke (eds). Writer identity and the teaching and learning of writing. Routledge.

Crusan, D., Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2016). Writing assessment literacy: Surveying second language teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and practices. Assessing Writing, 28, 43-56.

Davies, A. (2008). Textbook trends in teaching language testing. Language Testing, 25(3), 327–347.

Firoozi, T., Razavipour, K., & Ahmadi, A. (2019). The language assessment literacy needs of Iranian EFL teachers with a focus on reformed assessment policies. Language Testing in Asia, 9(1), 2.

Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom, Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132.

Gan, L., & Lam, R. (2022). A review on language assessment literacy: Trends, foci and contributions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 19(5), 503-525.

Haswell, R. H. (2009). Teaching of writing in higher education. In C. Bazerman (ed). Handbook of research on writing (pp. 405-424). Routledge.

Ivanič, R. (2004). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and education, 18(3), 220-245.

Jalilzadeh, K., Alavi, S. M., & Siyyari, M. (2023). EFL/ESL Teachers’ writing assessment literacy: State of the arts. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 15(1), 51-64.

Jeong, H. (2015). What is your teacher rubric? Extracting teachers' assessment constructs. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(6), n6.

Kwak, S. (2019). How Epistemologies Shape the Teaching and Learning of Argumentative Writing in Two 9th Grade English Language Arts Classrooms (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).

Kremmel, B., & Harding, L. (2019). Towards a comprehensive, empirical model of language assessment literacy across stakeholder groups: Developing the language assessment literacy survey. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(1), 100–120.

Looney, A., Cumming, J., van Der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2018). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(5), 442-467.

Matsuda, K. P. (2003). Process and post-process: A discursive history. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 (2003) 65–83

Marefat, F., & Heydari, M. (2018). English writing assessment in the context of Iran: The double life of Iranian test-takers. In The politics of English Second Language writing assessment in global contexts (pp. 67-81): Routledge.

Razavipour, K. (2025). Discourses of Writing in Negāresh Textbooks: The Neglect of Social Practice and Sociopolitical Discourses in the Pedagogy of Persian Writing. Iranian Studies, 1-21.

Roever, C., & McNamara, T. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 242-258.

Poehner, E. M. & Inbar-Lourie, O. (2020). An epistemology of action for understanding and change in l2 classroom assessment: The case for praxis. In M. E. Poehner & O. Inbar-Lourie (eds). toward a reconceptualization of second language classroom assessment: Praxis and researcher-teacher partnership (pp. 1-21). Springer.

Shohamy, E. (2020). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Routledge.

Silva, T., & Leki, I. (2004). Family matters: The influence of applied linguistics and composition studies on second language writing studies—Past, present, and future. The Modern Language Journal, 88(1), 1-13.

Sohrabi, Z., Ghanbari, N., & Abbasi, A. (2022). Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions of writing assessment literacy: a countrywide study. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 23.

Tajedin, Z., Khatib, M., & Mahdavi, M. (2023). Critical language assessment literacy of EFL teachers: Scale construction and validation. Language Testing, 39(4), 649–678.

Taylor, L. (2013). Communicating the theory, practice and principles of language testing to test stakeholders: Some reflections. Language Testing, 30(3), 403-412.

Tayyebi, M., Abbasabady, M. M., & Abbassian, G. R. (2022). Examining classroom writing assessment literacy: A focus on in-service EFL teachers in Iran. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 12.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press.

Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and teacher education, 58, 149-162.

Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 79-101.